Supersonic Jet Demonstrator
Before 2005
Gulfstream and Lockheed Martin plan to fly
a quiet, sonic boom-free supersonic technology demonstrator before
2005, and could have a supersonic business jet in production by
2010, according to Gulfstream president and chief operating officer
Bill Boisture. If the demonstration is successful, "we would
bring an aircraft to the market in the following five years",
Boisture said here Monday.
The two companies expect to receive some U.S. Government support
for the project via the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), the Pentagon's high-tech research office, because the
project has military as well as commercial implications.
The project is now being called QSAT, for quiet supersonic aircraft
technology. DARPA's QSAT budget this year would be around $20
million, but this would probably increase as work on proceeds
on a demonstrator. Boisture said he expects NASA to support the
program by continuing its work on propulsion, airframe and environmental
issues.
Within two years, says Boisture, Lockheed Martin and Gulfstream
will select a size and shape for the demonstrator, which could
range from a near-fullscale prototype to a smaller unmanned air
vehicle.
Supersonic business jet studies are being pushed by a formidable
triad of interests. Gulfstream -- now owned by General Dynamics,
which has become Wall Street's favorite aerospace and defense
prime contractor -- sees it as a potential follow-on to its current
airplanes. Lockheed Martin is looking for supersonic-cruise technology
that could be applied to future military and civil aircraft. The
two companies are being strongly encouraged by Warren Buffett,
owner of Executive Jet and the NetJets franchise, who has helped
Lockheed Martin lobby for government seed money.
"We have knocked down the barrier of distance for our customers
with the Gulfstream V," Boisture said. "The next barrier
is time. We've been encouraged by our early research with reference
to boom suppression. This aircraft must be capable of flying randomly
overland at supersonic speed."
Other companies, added Boisture, "have been discouraged because
there is not a quick pay-off, but we're in this for the long haul.
If someone's going to do it, this is the team."
On the government side, NASA administrator Dan Goldin has been
a consistent supporter of supersonic transport research. The termination
of NASA's High Speed Research (HSR) program, which was developing
technology for a 300-seat supersonic airliner, was not the agency's
choice, but NASA had no alternative when Boeing pulled out of
the project.
Goldin has not been able to establish a NASA program with Lockheed
Martin and Gulfstream, but may have helped win support for a DARPA
program, with potential civil and military applications. Goldin
has also supported the idea of rolling some of the HSR program's
engine research into a more broadly based project aimed at advanced
commercial engine technology.
Suppressing the sonic boom is critical to the concept, because
it increases the airplane's average speed on most city pairs and
avoids the need to compromise the design for subsonic cruise.
At the Paris air show in June, J.A. "Micky" Blackwell,
head of Lockheed Martin's aeronautics group, said that the company's
renowned Skunk Works had made advances in technology which would
reduce the peak overpressure caused by a supersonic aircraft to
the point where there would be no discernible boom on the ground.
"Low-boom" supersonic designs have been the subject
of many theoretical and design studies since the 1970s, most of
them focusing on such methods as tailoring the airplane's cross-section
and carefully balancing its size, weight, speed and cruising altitude.
A new advanced design group within the Skunk Works, headed by
veteran designer Ed Glasgow, may be conducting wind-tunnel tests
of the new low-boom designs within a few months. It is unlikely
that the design will resemble the twin-engine model that Gulfstream
and Lockheed unveiled in 1998, but -- for the moment--details
are being concealed as only the Skunks know how to do.
Dassault's supersonic studies were suspended last year when the
company determined that the fighter engines that it used as its
study baseline would have to be heavily redesigned for transport
use. Gulfstream and Lockheed Martin are talking to all three principal
U.S.-based engine manufacturers -- P&W, GE and Rolls-Royce
Allison -- about propulsion for the supersonic aircraft.
By Bill Sweetman
NBAA 1999, Atlanta, Ga.