|
European SE-IMC Gets Closer
The long-delayed implementation of Single Engine Commercial Night/IMC
in Europe looks finally to arrive no later than March 2003, according
to Ron Ashford of the Single Engine Turbine Alliance.
Europe's JAA issued its long-awaited Notice of Proposed Amendment
(NPA) for Single Engine Commercial Operations at Night and/or in
IMC in June. Interested parties have until September 30 to make
their comments.
|
Flying SE-IMC Anyway
The March 2003 date now promised for European SE-IMC implementation
is 15 months later than hoped for by both operators and manufacturers.
Frustration from single-engine turboprop aircraft manufacturer
Pilatus resulted in a protest to the JAA (just after EBACE,
Geneva) in desperation to keep their PC-12 production line
going.
Some European nations have already implemented
their own SE-IMC rules because of JAA foot-dragging, and the
numbers have grown further this year.
SE-IFR cargo-only operations are permitted
by exemption in Denmark, Finland, France, Greenland, Norway,
Spain and Sweden; Switzerland has stated that it will approve
passenger and cargo operations in accordance with the current
JAA Notice of Proposed Amendment. The exemption will apply
to Swiss operators flying Swiss-registered aircraft within
Swiss airspace.
|
At present, JAR 1.525(a) does not allow an operator to fly a single-engine
airplane at night and/or in IMC, except under special VFR.
"I think it's fair to say that they [the JAA Operations Sectarial
Team working on the proposed final rule] are not likely or expected
to overrule anything from the working group," Ashford says.
"They may touch on procedural matters within the main text.
After this, the revised NPA goes to the JAA committee for the final
rule decision. I suspect at this stage the UK CAA will try to put
back in a 'cargo only' trial period, but I don't think they will
do anything unilaterally."
All that a tightlipped CAA spokesman would say to Show News
is, "We are currently considering our response to the NPA."
The NPA does not address single- or dual-pilot operations. Ashford
says, "Single pilot at night for cargo continues [in the NPA],
but there is a separate ICAO initiative on when two pilots should
be required that everyone is conscious of, and the JAA doesn't want
to second-guess." This won't be added to the NPA but will be
issued as a separate rule at a later date.
Because of the frustration felt by some potential single-engine
turboprop operators, a few European JAA countries have exempted
themselves from the current JAA rules and have allowed limited Night
and IMC cargo operations.
It is thought that the French will also go along with a SE-IMC
commercial passenger rule once it is on the books. At the moment
only cargo operations are allowed in French airspace under the French
exemption from the current JAA rules.
The Spanish DGAC exemption was approved on Dec. 27, 2001, for
dual pilot SE-IMC day/night cargo operations.
In line with the Spanish decision, four Cessna Caravan Cargomasters
are currently operating under these rules. Two of the Cargomasters
have been operated by Swift Air since March on the Madrid-Mallorca
route. One is operated by Lanzarote Air Cargo within the Canary
Islands, and Al Aire operate out of Madrid. Five more Caravans have
been ordered, says Cessna's man in Madrid, Marc Bloomfield. He says
that the first of these, another Cargomaster, will be delivered
in December of this year. Spanish passenger operations will start
as soon as SE-IMC is approved by the JAA, according to another Cessna
spokesperson.
Currently the NPA's equipment list requirements include a radio
altimeter, two separate electrical generating systems, two attitude
indicators powered from independent sources, airborne weather radar,
emergency electrical supply (battery), and an area navigation system
using equipment qualified for approach accuracy and capable of being
programmed with aerodrome and emergency landing sites en route.
Pilot training will be tightly monitored as will aircraft maintenance
procedures, according to the NPA.
The JAA target is to better one fatality per five million hours
in commercial service. "We require an engine/airframe reliability
requirement just like ETOPS for SE-IMC," Ashford says. Individual
state authorities will be responsible for its implementation and
monitoring.
"I think it will all go through, but some impracticables
need to be ironed out before the NPA becomes law," Ashford
says. "For example, having a forced landing area available
throughout the cruise except for the specified risk periods [which
were picked up from the Australian legislation] does not contribute
anything measurable in safety terms and is far too complicated in
practice. Thus the one country [Australia] that went that far is
now intending to change it back to that of the American/Canadian
rules."
The NPA's operational approval section contains revised planning
and aerodrome operating minima requirements, but the "continuous
availability of a landing site has been relaxed." This, says
the JAA document, "is justified on the basis of the introduction
of risk periods for takeoff, departure, en route and arrival phases
of flight." Additional crew training requirements have also
been rationalized and expanded.
By Mike Vines
|