Does speed matter? When Continental Airlines shaved at least two
hours off everybody else's one-stop flights from New York to Hong
Kong, passengers sat up and took notice.
Its introduction of a non-stop, over-the-Pole, over-Russia, over-China
flight from Newark to Hong Kong with a 777-200ER (at 7,337 nmi the
longest route operated by an U.S. airline and the longest ever operated
out of New York) captured the imagination-and passengers, too.
The flight takes 15 and a half hours (is it northbound? or westbound?)
to get to Hong Kong, and about 16 and a half hours the other way.
And, according to John Roundhill, marketing VP for new airplane
programs at Boeing, it has galvanized interest from airlines around
the world in his company's new Sonic Cruiser. If these are the type
of long, thin routes the airlines want to fly, how well could they
use a much faster, sonic airplane that could cut off another two
hours on routes up to 9,000 nmi?
"Several months ago, when working on 747 growth derivatives,
we heard from the airlines there was as much if not more interest
in the very long range versions. We realized it was really the range
as much as the size that was of interest," Roundhill told Show
News. "So we rolled out this fast airplane we've been working
on for 30 years-well, over many concepts-and the idea just clicked
of a faster airplane that could go 7,000 miles or greater at about
the size of 767."
So the Sonic Cruiser emerged, not from Boeing's Phantom Works, but
from feedback from the airlines as Boeing was trying to sell them
something very different.
"The airlines said they would continue to fly 747s but they
saw a lot of the future growth being handled by smaller airplanes,
particularly if they were available at long ranges," Roundhill
said. "If they could go faster, so much the better."
The feedback was so strong that Boeing put development of future
747s on the back burner in favor of the new, fast (and physically
long and thin) Sonic Cruiser.
Cruising at Mach .95 to .98, the Sonic Cruiser will cut one to two
and a half hours off routes between 3,000 nmi and 9,000 nmi by going
faster, and sometimes by eliminating a stop. Boeing is sizing it
between 150 and 250 seats so as not to compete with the longer range
777. Indeed, it can be thought of as a very fast 767, and about
the same size, too.
Five years ago Boeing considered a "Pacific Fragmenter"
aircraft that would bypass hubs and develop point-to-point traffic
with rather fewer seats than a 747, but technology was five years
further back then, and the airline industry still focused on hubs.
Now, new technology makes the Sonic Cruiser possible. The three
enablers are:
- The configuration and geometry of the airplane itself, which
represents a radical departure in the design of airliners, and
the materials available to make it. "Speed likes thin"
as far as the wings are concerned, and this can be achieved
with advanced aluminum or composites, said Roundhill. He expects
the outboard wing structure to be composite.
- Advances in engine technology over the last ten years mean
efficiency and reliability can be predicted right out of the
box, and an engine can be designed to Sonic Cruiser requirements
relatively quickly-as soon as Boeing stops playing with the
rubber and defines the airplane. All three engine manufacturers
are working with Boeing on possible powerplants.
- Weight saving. "Faster airplanes like low drag and love
to have weight saved," said Roundhill. So extensive use
of composites or advanced aluminum alloys and minimum gauge
materials in the primary structure, and advanced systems applications,
will all help to reduce weight.
The airplane itself features a large-area double delta wing that
will allow it to climb to altitudes 8,000 feet above conventional
aircraft in five less minutes; a constant section "tube"
fuselage that can be stretched or shrunk before the wing join dictates
coke-bottle area-ruling, and all-moving canards for trim that include
a separate elevator, and another elevator at the extreme tail end
of the airplane.