|
The world trainer market remains stagnant, with few signs of recovery.
This is being caused by a unique combination of unfortunate
circumstances--low demand and oversupply. The demand problem shows few
signs of improving, but at least the glut of new trainers is subsiding.
From the supply side, there is an overabundance of trainers and light
attack aircraft, mostly because these are the easiest military aircraft
to design and build. There are very few barriers to trainer market
entry. The result has been a proliferation of indigenous trainer
designs, with small production runs, high unit costs, few export orders
and few industrial skills learned.
The situation is little better on the demand side of the equation.
Trainer demand has dropped off because defense forces have been cut
worldwide and because pilot training requirements have changed.
Information and systems management now takes precedence over aerial
flight skills, and the former can best be honed in ground-based
simulators. But the biggest factor suppressing trainer demand has been
shared trainer fleets.
National trainer fleets generally are unnecessary for national security,
and the whole process is easily outsourced, saving money for new fighter
jets and other pressing requirements. Singapore, for example, uses
primary trainers based in Australia (soon to be run by a private
contractor) and advanced trainers at NATO Flight Training in Canada
(NFTC). Britain is sending pilots to NFTC, and starting its own
privately run Military Flying Training System. MFTS will also be
available for foreign pilots. Even Israel, with its security-conscious
military, is planning to outsource basic training requirements to the
private sector.
The best example of the shared fleet trend is NFTC. Run by Bombardier,
NFTC trains pilots from different countries with a single fleet of BAE
Hawk 100s and Raytheon T-6s leased to clients on a "power-by-the-hour"
basis. In addition to the U.K. and Singapore, Canada, Italy, Hungary and
Denmark are customers.
While European nations have expressed interest in a similar program for
years, it was only in December 2001 that they agreed to create an
Advanced European Jet Pilot Training (AEJPT) program. But funding for
this effort is highly uncertain, despite big plans to couple it with
creation of a new Eurotrainer aircraft. In the interim, European nations
will continue to coast using legacy fleets and other training services
(like NFTC). Because of the continuing soft demand, the glut of new
trainer programs seems to be drying up. And, as fewer new programs enter
the market, some existing ones will do well. This particularly applies
to the BAE Systems Hawk, Raytheon's T-6, Pilatus' PC-9/21 series and
Embraer's Tucano series.
Two trainer programs that are unlikely to have much of an effect on the
global market, though, are South Korea's KT-1 and A/T-50. Designed
primarily for indigenous use, the aircraft will have limited opportunity
to prove itself outside South Korea.
To try 4 FREE issues of Aviation Week & Space Technology,
click here.
|