The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Ares I-X Wrong Launch at Wrong Time

NASA will try for a second time to launch the Ares 1-X and that's a shame. In my view, no good can come from the launch. No matter the technical results, we run the risk of making the wrong policy decision by conducting the launch in the midst of the White House deliberations on the Augustine Commission report.

If the suborbital test launch is successful, supporters of the multi-billion dollar program will tout the eventual success of the entire program as a done deal. And that of course is wrong. Momentum for continuation will only increase. After all, we've already spent almost half a billion dollars say supporters...how can we cancel now?

To make those calls based on one test flight is wrong. After all, the Augustine Commission found the Ares program to be in good shape for a test program--what was questioned was the need for the rocket given the expected first launch date of 2017, just when the space station is in its final years in orbit.

But the opposite possibility also troubles me. If the test launch is a failure, then the program critics will pounce. Never mind it is a test launch and many first vehicles meet an unexpected end.

Again, I don't want to see policy made because of a single test launch.

No, it is a fool's errand for NASA to conduct this launch at this time. It may well lead to a knee jerk reaction based on the technical results of a test mission.

Wrong launch. Good engineers. Good product. Bad timing.



Tags: os99AresNASA
Email this post
User Image
cpooley wrote:
Ares a symptom of the NASA problem--the Cold War is over and the pork barrel based system has to be re configured.

Some new paradigm like Microlaunchers is needed (you can google that)
10/28/2009 9:41 AM CDT
Space News
Recent Photos
Selected Videos