The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
On Its Trolley - X-51A 'Rolls Out'

The first X-51A WaveRider, complete with its rocket booster and scramjet engine, has arrived at Boeing's Huntington Beach, Calif., plant for structural testing leading up to a first flight attempt late this year.

blog post photo
Photo: Boeing

This is the "Stacked Test Vehicle", or STV, and is being used for ground testing of the complete stack - the modified ATACMS missile booster at the back, in white, and the X-51A cruiser at the front, unpainted. The thing looks pretty small on its trolley - but the hopes of the hypersonic community ride of the success of this vehicle.

The X-51 can trace its roots all the way back to the X-30 National Aero-Space Plane, and its cancellation in 1993. The U.S. Air Force continued work on the two-dimensional scramjet flowpath through a series of ground demonstrator engines till it arrived at the Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne SJY61 fuel-cooled, hydrocarbon-fuelled, dual-mode ramjet/scramjet that will power the X-51A. That's it, just visible under the cruiser:

blog post photo

The X-51A is tiny compared to the X-30, but if it flies successfully it will be a huge boost for hypersonics, and could find near-term application in a high-speed strike missile. The first flight attempt is planned for late October, with the stack to be dropped from a B-52 over the Pacific and boosted to around Mach 4.5, where the cruiser will separate, ignite its scramjet and accelerate to beyond Mach 6, staying there for about 250 seconds before its JP-7 fuel is exhausted and it plunges into the ocean.

Tags: arr99X-51hypersonicscramjet
Email this post
User Image
Bobbymike wrote:
The future of warfare is all about speed, hypersonic and speed of light weaponry. As our current and future opponents learn that "detection" means "death" in a ever shortening timeframe the more difficult it will be for them operate in the open frustrating their combat and logistical operations.
5/13/2009 10:43 AM CDT
User Image
S-64 Skycrane wrote:
Pretty, it certainly is not.
5/13/2009 1:57 PM CDT
User Image
sferrin wrote:
I'd be surprised if this design is ever weaponized. I read somewhere that because of the nose design and CG issue the nose is essentially a big chunk of tungsten (as was the case with the X-43) so you end up wasting payload capacity that could be used for fuel, avionics, or warhead just to fly.
5/13/2009 4:27 PM CDT
User Image
Bobbymike wrote:
At Mach 6+ and GPS accuracy you might not need a warhead, a big chunk of tungsten might do the trick!
5/13/2009 9:59 PM CDT
User Image
S-64 Skycrane wrote:
sferrin,

The link below to a Stephen Trimble post might have been what your were recalling. It details the Frankenstein make up of the X-51. I am pretty sure the people from Monster Garage are now running Boeing.

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/03/as-the-first-mach-60.html
5/13/2009 11:00 PM CDT
User Image
Rhyolite wrote:
I hope they a follow on in the works if the X-51A is successful. I think it was tragic that a successful program like X-43 never led to a next step.

S-64 Skycrane,

Thanks for the link. It sounds like the program has their priorities straight. And, if they are successful, they have a lot of margin to exploit for better performance in a future model.
5/14/2009 12:13 AM CDT
User Image
sferrin wrote:
S-64: Yeah that's the one. Tungsten is relatively light-weight? Compared to what, neutronium? ;-)
5/14/2009 7:32 AM CDT
User Image
Rhyolite - Boeing has designs through the X-51H on the drawing board. The next one in line would be, if funded, the X-51B with the ATK Thermally Throated Ramjet engine. Guy has reported that AFRL and Boeing want to extend range to missile-relevant distances and make the vehicle recoverable.
5/14/2009 8:11 AM CDT
User Image
Bobbymike wrote:
Graham - Is Boeing not also doing work on a combined cycle turbine/ramjet to go from 0 to Mach 4? That speed would allow a transition to a scramjet. The goal being 0 to Mach 6+ from a runway launched and recovered platform.
5/14/2009 1:12 PM CDT
User Image
The Skunk Works cancelled Blackswift was to have had turbine-based combined cycle engines. I think AFRL's hope is to get the funds to evolve X-51 to the point where it could demonstrate the technology
5/14/2009 4:45 PM CDT
1 2 >> Last
Most Recent Tags
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos