The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
Boeing's New Bomber

On show at the Air Force Association convention:  Boeing's model of the Next Generation Bomber.

The NGB program got a strong boost here from USAF chief of staff Gen. Norton Schwartz. "It's very important. We face increasingly lethal and difficult threats, and it's a vital program. We're going to make a strong, fact-based argument for the NGB as we move into the spring and summer of 2009," Schwartz said, indicating that it will be a high priority as the USAF prepares for the next quadrennial defense review (QDR), due in early 2010.

Boeing's blended-wing-body design is "not a cartoon, it's representative of what we're doing," according to Boeing Advanced Systems president Darryl Davis.


blog post photo

The new design is very different from Northrop Grumman's studies, with a large diamond-shaped centerbody mated to long, slender wings. Davis dropped some hints, too, about Phantom Works research into laminar flow control. Some way of keeping the airflow over the upper surface smooth would make an enormous difference to the drag of the body, while the outer wings are slender enough to sustain laminar flow naturally, like a sailplane.


blog post photo

The head-on aspect is ominous, with a tiny windshield and slit-like inlets - but a close look shows enough depth for a large weapon bay. "You want to make the aircraft as efficient and small as you can," says Davis, with "extreme survivability".

Despite its radical looks, Davis says that the new bomber would not require new technology. The watchword, he says, is "integration, not invention."

Northrop Grumman, too, showed a model representing its bomber studies, albeit one seen before:


blog post photo

Noteworthy is the fact that the "cranked kite" shape yields a relatively long center-section, easing engine integration and making room for a large weapon bay.

Tags: ar99ngbboeingafa
Email this post
User Image
DensityDuck wrote:
X-45 called, they want their display model back.
9/16/2008 12:53 PM CDT
User Image
gaurav_test wrote:
I believe you mean X-47B...
9/16/2008 3:05 PM CDT
User Image
ELP wrote:
If it isn't cheap to maintain and can't generate the MC rates of a B-52 it won't be much worth. Shaping...OK... but it better not spend much time in the phase hanger doing L.O. refurb or we are screwed. Also this looks like it will take money from the F-35. Don't expect that to be allowed with out a duel of lobbiests. Grass at dawn.
9/20/2008 6:41 AM CDT
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos