The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
Exclusive: Aurora Flies VTOL Excalibur

Aurora Flight Sciences has flown its Excalibur experimental vertical takeoff and landing unmanned combat aircraft. The subscale proof-of-principle aircraft made its first hover at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland on June 24 and Aviation Week has the story, with exclusive pictures and video (here).

blog post photo

blog post photo

blog post photo
Photos: Aurora Flight Sciences

The 13ft-long, 10ft-span Excalibur is a half-scale version of a VTOL UCAV designed to carry a 400lb weapons payload - four Hellfires - at speeds up to 400kt. The aircraft is the testbed for a hybrid turbine-electric propulsion system which combines a tilting 700lb thrust-class turbojet and three 12kW battery-powered lift fans.

blog post photo
Full-size UCAV (Concept: Aurora)

Aurora had hoped to fly Excalibur last last year, but diverted resources to completing development of its GoldenEye 80 ducted-fan VTOL tactical UAV. Although AATD and ONR have supported the program, Aurora conducted the first hover flight on its own funds.

The company plans to complete initial hover-phase testing at speeds up 20kt, but is looking for funding to modify the vehicle for medium-speed flights up to 40kt, which will involve making the aerodynamic control surfaces active. If it can secure funds, Aurora plans to build a second demonstrator for high-speed testing - one that can retract the lift fans, retract the gear and tilt the engine down.

blog post photo
Art: Aurora

Tags: ar99AuroraVTOLUCAV
Email this post
User Image
Marcase wrote:
Now that, is one cool piece of flying kit. Can't wait to see a succesfull transition to forward flight. If this works as aniticipated, the days of the large prop driven UAS may be coming to an end, not to mention no more fiddling with the complicated tiltrotor VTUAVs (such as the cancelled Eagleye).

I wonder if this configuration also shields the jet intake from direct radar detection, it kinda looks it does.

Great post Graham!
7/19/2009 2:52 AM CDT
User Image
Praet wrote:
With pretty much the whole airframe dedicated to either the lift devices themselves or stuff to hold the lift devices in place, or fuel tanks to keep the engines running, I wonder where they plan to cram in all the electronics, sensors and antennas required to make this one more than an interesting concept.
7/19/2009 7:29 AM CDT
User Image
Solomon wrote:
If the Eagle Eye didn't make it into service, then I don't see how this one has any hope at all. UAV's are starting to look like all the UGV programs out there. A whole lot of thunder but no lightning. I wonder how much could be saved if we rationalized the entire process so that we're getting unmanned vehicles that are actually designed to do certain jobs instead of all this experimental nonsense that leads no where?
7/19/2009 10:16 AM CDT
User Image
Marcase wrote:
Not so negative Solomon, it's not a Raptor ;).

Granted, the large Mule UGVs aren't doing much (yet), but their little Packbot brothers are doing some real neat stuff.

The Eagle Eye was a too complicated piece of flying kit, too expensive and suffering from (among other things) tiltrotor transition difficulties, or so I'm told. Give the Osprey another few years to really mature and tiltrotor VTUAVs will return eventually. I hope.

This jet/electric fan VTOL approach hasn't been tried before, and I always applaud new aerospace experiments, as it would make for a more smoother flight with the usual higher speed and altitude advantages.

What *is* going to make the tests interesting is that "flip-over" transition once in flight - I don't really see why they bother, looks like the take-off configuration would fly just as well.
7/19/2009 2:06 PM CDT
User Image
Solomon wrote:
There is nothing new under the sun....This fan-in-wing concept has been done before. The Ryan XV-5. It wasn't pursued because of difficulties in transition. I predict the same with this, especially since they're using the jet to augment the lift from the fans. Another failing of the Ryan project was its lack of payload and fuel capacity. If you think the Eagle Eye was complicated then keep an eye on this thing. My prediction. LAWN DART.
7/19/2009 3:49 PM CDT
User Image
batteries are heavy.....
7/20/2009 9:20 AM CDT
User Image
This is a testbed.

Yes, fan-in-wing has been done before, but it needed complex ducting or shafting. Tilt-rotor needs rotating nacelles and cross-shafting. This needs wires, and there is geater freedom of location for the fans.

Transition may be an issue, but we have fly-by-wire these days. Also, having the lift fans provide 30% of vertical lift may help during transition.

Batteries are heavy, but battery and motor techology is advancing faster than jet engine technology. Will a set of electric lift fans be any heavier than a shaft-driven lift fan, three-bearing nozzle and roll posts?
7/20/2009 4:24 PM CDT
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos