Back around Aero-India, certain of Gripen's competitors (you know who you are) were circulating the rumor that the NG version was in trouble because it didn't have a radar. The demonstrator will fly with a Thales active electronically scanned array (AESA) but the French government and Dassault - now seeing the NG as a competitor in India and Brazil - had blocked the export of a production radar.
By that time, though, it was pretty clear that Saab was talking to Selex - which, back when it was Ferranti, was a partner on the Gripen radar - about its own AESA technology. Saab had also been very clear that the Thales AESA was purely there for test purposes.
Now that the Saab-Selex deal is official, Saab has posted a brochure on the planned radar - showing that it uses the "swashplate" design mooted by Selex some years ago. I discussed it here in connection with Eurofighter.
Saab
With a 200 degree field of regard in azimuth and elevation, the swashplate AESA is strong in off-boresight performance, an area where the fixed AESA is weak - because the latter loses performance off-boresight and can't scan more than 120 degrees at all. And it does it all with one mechanical bearing, which is much less highly loaded than the gimbals of a mechanically scanned radar.
In BVR missile engagements, the wide-angle scan allows you to launch a missile and continue to track the target while weaving to make the adversary's shot more difficult. In WVR, it works well with a datalink-equipped high-off-boresight missile. It's also possible to see how it would work in an all-weather or through-weather attack on a moving ground target, allowing the fighter to keep tracking the target (updating a guided bomb in flight) by performing a "pylon turn" around the target's location.
---
The Emperor: Rise my friend.
Darth Vader: The Death Star will be completed on schedule.
The Emperor: You've done well, Lord Vader.
Darth Vader: Yes, my Master.
The Emperor: Patience, my friend. In time, he will seek *you* out, and when he does, you must bring him before me. He has grown strong. Only together can we turn him to the Dark Side of the Force.
Darth Vader: As you wish.
The Emperor: Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.
Now when are they going to pick a name for the new radar?
I would now just advise SAAB to re-market this radar with a further upgraded Next-Gen GRIPEN... perhaps with bigger Delta wing Internal fuel capacity, CFT and a new %10 power-upgraded F414 unit (kick start that baby now!)
Then it will be the road-operating SAAB 4.5+ it was meant to be!
B. Bolsøy
Oslo
everything has a price. The US has put its money on stealth design which makes it less vital for them to operate a picture perfect radar. A F-22 would hold a nice BVR edge today against most other fighters even with a far less capable radar. Gripen and Eurofighter can't count on low-observability as much and can't compromise on the sensor view for their situational awareness.
solomon,
Gripen NG is superior to F-16B60+ in every way and will by 2015 be the only affordable hightech single-engine fighter on the market. Gripen NG has already beaten F-16B60+ in the Brazilian tender.
'DAS' will have far reduced detection range than Radar?
And if I read it correctly, EOTS will not have such an automated detection capability, until perhaps 2019 with introduction of 'IRST' facility on IOC 'Block V'?