The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
Wide-Angle Radar For Gripen NG

Back around Aero-India, certain of Gripen's competitors (you know who you are) were circulating the rumor that the NG version was in trouble because it didn't have a radar. The demonstrator will fly with a Thales active electronically scanned array (AESA) but the French government and Dassault - now seeing the NG as a competitor in India and Brazil - had blocked the export of a production radar.

By that time, though, it was pretty clear that Saab was talking to Selex - which, back when it was Ferranti, was a partner on the Gripen radar - about its own AESA technology. Saab had also been very clear that the Thales AESA was purely there for test purposes.

Now that the Saab-Selex deal is official, Saab has posted a brochure on the planned radar - showing that it uses the "swashplate" design mooted by Selex some years ago. I discussed it here in connection with Eurofighter. 

blog post photo
Saab

With a 200 degree field of regard in azimuth and elevation, the swashplate AESA is strong in off-boresight performance, an area where the fixed AESA is weak - because the latter loses performance off-boresight and can't scan more than 120 degrees at all. And it does it all with one mechanical bearing, which is much less highly loaded than the gimbals of a mechanically scanned radar. 

In BVR missile engagements, the wide-angle scan allows you to launch a missile and continue to track the target while weaving to make the adversary's shot more difficult. In WVR, it works well with a datalink-equipped high-off-boresight missile. It's also possible to see how it would work in an all-weather or through-weather attack on a moving ground target, allowing the fighter to keep tracking the target (updating a guided bomb in flight) by performing a "pylon turn" around the target's location.

Tags: ar99gripenselex
Email this post
User Image
ELP wrote:
Meanwhile, back at the competion....

---

The Emperor: Rise my friend.

Darth Vader: The Death Star will be completed on schedule.

The Emperor: You've done well, Lord Vader.

Darth Vader: Yes, my Master.

The Emperor: Patience, my friend. In time, he will seek *you* out, and when he does, you must bring him before me. He has grown strong. Only together can we turn him to the Dark Side of the Force.

Darth Vader: As you wish.

The Emperor: Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.
5/1/2009 3:56 AM CDT
User Image
Airpower wrote:
I'm not sure the Thales antenna will ever fly on the Demo. I think it's been left in a Lidl bag at a Linköping bus stop...

Now when are they going to pick a name for the new radar?
5/1/2009 7:03 AM CDT
User Image
Solomon wrote:
will someone please tell me why this airplane is even in development?? its not even on par with a Block 60 F-16...yet its somehow being put forward as a next gen fighter? why? the NG serves one purpose...to continue production of an airplane series for a few more years.
5/1/2009 7:15 PM CDT
User Image
Geogen wrote:
Hell ya Bill... Cheers!

I would now just advise SAAB to re-market this radar with a further upgraded Next-Gen GRIPEN... perhaps with bigger Delta wing Internal fuel capacity, CFT and a new %10 power-upgraded F414 unit (kick start that baby now!)

Then it will be the road-operating SAAB 4.5+ it was meant to be!
5/1/2009 9:44 PM CDT
User Image
energo wrote:
One is left to wonder why the US, who is leading this field, have not persued this approach on the F-35. Embedded antenna designs a bit further down the road could be one possible answer, and perhaps the US designs have matured to the level that sidelobe performance at the extreme scan angles is good enough to offset extra cost and maintainability issues of such a setup.

B. Bolsøy
Oslo
5/2/2009 6:12 PM CDT
User Image
viperfan wrote:
Energo,

everything has a price. The US has put its money on stealth design which makes it less vital for them to operate a picture perfect radar. A F-22 would hold a nice BVR edge today against most other fighters even with a far less capable radar. Gripen and Eurofighter can't count on low-observability as much and can't compromise on the sensor view for their situational awareness.

solomon,

Gripen NG is superior to F-16B60+ in every way and will by 2015 be the only affordable hightech single-engine fighter on the market. Gripen NG has already beaten F-16B60+ in the Brazilian tender.

5/2/2009 9:10 PM CDT
User Image
Bill Sweetman wrote:
The US position, first of all, is that the swashplate was Not Invented Here, and wasn't known when the F-35 was designed. Also, the USAF planned to resolve the problem of off-boresight performance with side arrays on the F-22 - there's space/weight/power/cooling for them, but when it will happen, who knows - and with 442 F-22s (planned in the mid-1990s) they did not need that capability in the F-35.
5/3/2009 6:36 AM CDT
User Image
sferrin wrote:
Also with "active skin" (or whatever they call it) just around the corner why bother with the diversion of a rotating array that just adds one more thing that can break and requires maintenance?
5/3/2009 9:51 AM CDT
User Image
Solomon wrote:
i thought the Distributed Aperture System AN/AAQ-37 on the F-35 took care of at least part of this issue. also the F-35 has EOTS which should more than solve the off-bore targeting problem.
5/3/2009 11:05 AM CDT
User Image
Geogen wrote:
Solo,

'DAS' will have far reduced detection range than Radar?

And if I read it correctly, EOTS will not have such an automated detection capability, until perhaps 2019 with introduction of 'IRST' facility on IOC 'Block V'?
5/3/2009 8:08 PM CDT
1 2 >> Last
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos