The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
What Is an FLKA?

An FLKA is a Funny Looking King Air as any fule kno. Those splendid people who helped expand the meaning of the Greenland-originated word "anorak" caught another one on the ground at Hawarden airport in England the other day.


blog post photo

This particular FLKA is one of four to be used by the British Army (not the RAF) in Afghanistan. It's based on a Hawker Beechcraft Super King Air 350ER, with extra fuel tanks above the engine nacelles, a higher gross weight, and big ventral fins to keep the pointy end going forwards if one of the PT6As corpses during a hot, high, heavy take-off.

Operational equipment clearly includes an electro-optical turret, lots of signals intelligence gear and a missile-approach warning system (presumably combined with flares, since otherwise it is an imminent-demise warning system). There may be a radar in there as well.

Other FLKAs include the US Army's C-12R Aerial Reconnaissance Multisensor System (ARMS), which has flown with Task Force Odin to track insurgent activities.

blog post photo

The Iraqi Army also uses a similar aircraft, with General Atomics' Lynx radar, and a new US-based operation, Avwatch, has now been formed to operate apparently piloted aircraft for homeland security missions.

FLKAs - and similar types based on different airframes - are a curious creature, representing the fusion of UAV sensors with manned aircraft. The demand for UAVs has created the payloads for the job, and the fact that there are never enough UAVs has created the need for these aircraft.

Not only has training and deployment of UAV units lagged demand, but if they are operating over any substantial distance they start to hog a lot of satellite bandwidth. The FLKA, with sensor operators, intelligence specialists and linguists in the cabin, is autonomous.

For homeland security, the FLKA has two other advantages:  there are no problems about UAVs in civil airspace, and (particularly in North America) pilots are really, really cheap. Flying patrol orbits over the Gulf of Mexico is a very fast way to build up hours until an airline will offer you a job.

Back in the 1950s, Britain's tiny Saunders-Roe company was building the rocket-powered SR.53 fighter. Designer Maurice Brennan, according to some of my old Flight colleagues, used to defend the concept against missile fanatics by remarking that "the guidance system weighs 200 pounds and drinks gin." That argument seems to be valid today.

Pics: Chris Hall of Hawarden Spotters, US Army. Tip: Jackonicko

Tags: ar99kingairreconnaissance
Email this post
User Image
I think there is a large potential market for FLKAs, as well as FLCCs, FLPCs and others, for several reasons. As you note, there are not enough UAVs; export is not always easy as they can fall under rules intended to prevent to proliferation of cruise missiles; UAVs are far from unmanned, as need ground infrastructure and crew training beyond the resources of some countries; they are a good way to start working with the kinds of data UAVs produce; as you say, they can share airspace with other manned aircraft; and some will be able to be optionally manned, which gives you the best of both worlds. Finally, you can always give the boss a riude in your King Air - you might not want to on your Predator
11/18/2008 12:48 PM CST
User Image
Bill Sweetman wrote:
"Finally, you can always give the boss a ride in your King Air - you might not want to on your Predator."

I've known some bosses who might benefit from that treatment.
11/18/2008 1:17 PM CST
User Image
Solomon wrote:
hmmm this might be the real trend in medium and short endurance ISR. the loss rate of the current class of uav's make them expensive indeed...i speak of losses due to take offs and landings. another reason why the navy is worried about adding ucavs to the flight deck...imagine a uav fouling your carrier and having manned planes circling the ship, flying on fumes! but back to the point, the loss rate is the dirty secret that uav fans aren't pointing out. they cost as much as manned aircraft and don't have the guy or gal in the seat to at least have situational awareness to possibly get it home safely....back to the future...the King Air, the new 0-1 bird dog.
11/18/2008 9:27 PM CST
Most Recent Tags
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos