The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
Jump Jeep - DARPA's TX Transformer

Forget your flying car, the flying jeep is coming. Maybe. DARPA hopes to kick off a program in fiscal 2010 called the Transformer (TX) Vehicle. It's only seeking $2 million for trade studies, but if it gets off the ground, the TX program could be a boon for those trying to develop flying cars, sorry, roadable aircraft.

blog post photo
Transition. (Photo: Terrafugia)

Looking most promising so far is the Terrafugia Transition, which has just finished proof of concept flight testing, with deliveries planned to begin in 2011. But while it's designed to drive on the highway, the folding-wing Transition is intended to fly between airports. DARPA is looking for a vehicle than lifts off from a road to fly over obstacles, terrain, ambushes and roadside bombs.

The trade studies will look at things like hybrid electric ducted-fan propulsion, ring motors, ultra-capacitors, morphing vehicle bodies, and flight controls that allow a "typical soldier", rather than a trained pilot, to fly the TX. The goal is a road-going vehicle that can fly for 2 hours on a tank of fuel, carrying one to four people.

There have been attempts to develop a flying jeep before, but most were not designed also to be roadgoing vehicles. Examples include the ducted-rotor Chrysler VZ-6 and Piasecki VZ-8 AirGeep, flying-saucer Avro VZ-9 Avrocar, even the highly dubious Moller Skycar. And a quick Google search for "roadable aircraft" shows the dream - if not the reality - of a flying-driving car is alive and well. I rather like this one, from Samson Motorworks...

blog post photo
Switchblade. (Concept: Samson Motorworks)

Tags: ar99DARPAVTOL
Email this post
User Image
Bill Sweetman wrote:
Calling International Rescue (crackle)... calling International Rescue...
6/8/2009 12:54 PM CDT
User Image
jhae22 wrote:
My question: what is the point of the drivable mode?

If the intent of the program is "for a vehicle than lifts off from a road to fly over obstacles, terrain, ambushes and roadside bombs," then why not use a cargo aircraft/helicopter? For patrols, UAS/UCAS should be up to the task; if infantry is needed to pursue a hostile element/investigate something more closely, then just drop some in. . If the ground is such a high-threat environment, perhaps the best course of action would be to switch to a more "air-centric" CONOPS.

Also, I would think the need to reduce weight for the flying mode would reduce the utility of the "roadable a/c" as a combat vehicle.

It's a good technology demonstration, but at this point I see little practical use.
6/9/2009 9:39 PM CDT
Most Recent Tags
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos