Future U.S. Secretary of State Talks More of Less ... Military
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) says she supports the Pentagon’s new Africa Command, but she also worries that “we have to be careful that it “doesn’t appear that our only real government engagement throughout Africa is our new military presence.”
Photo: Courtesy Sen. Clinton’s office
Clinton, who is President-elect Barack Obama’s choice to be Secretary of State, says State Department funding is a big problem. “We have so under-resourced our diplomacy and our development” programs, she says, adding that more and more overseas tasks are being turned over to the military – like civil reconstruction and operating health clinics.
In her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Clinton said withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq and combining both defense and diplomatic efforts to project “smart power,” were among the Obama administration’s foreign policy priorities.
“We must use what has been called ‘smart power,’ the full range of tools at our disposal – diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal and cultural … for each situation,” Clinton said in her opening statement. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and departing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have voiced a similar policy push before lawmakers.
Gates has said the State Department should get more funding for civil reconstruction projects, even if it means less money for the Pentagon. Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), a member of the committees that oversee both State and Defense, praises the concept, noting that “the implications go beyond the notion of turf wars.” The issue addresses how the U.S. is perceived around the world, he says, and increasingly, it's “as a military guarantor in other countries’ instead of an economic or cultural partner.
Clinton also said the Obama camp is conducting a policy review of relations with Iran with plans to use diplomacy, sanctions and coalitions to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. She said, however, Obama’s team has “no illusions” about dealing with the Islamic republic adding: “We’re not taking any option off the table.”
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/007hewpv.asp
sorry cowboy but if you extended your reading to business sites then you would know that the issue using defense spending as stimulus has been discussed at length since mid dec. Larry Summers (Obama's senior economic adviser) is on record as saying that all stimulus is good including that spent on defense. as a matter of fact that same sentiment has been expressed on these very pages. i like people patting themselves on the back but you should find a different subject, this pony has been rode almost as hard as the F-35 controversy. as a matter of fact the video concerning an additional buy of F-22's points to the fact that the reasoning for hope in the USAF on that front is due to the Obama administration not wanting to lose skilled jobs during this economic downturn!
I'll be interested to see/hear what people have to say about the departing administration after Bush (W.) has been out of office for a while.
On the matter at hand. Does anybody think defense spending is not the way to go to revive the economy.
Any 4 percent of GDP advocates out there?
-jmd