The McGraw-Hill Companies
Aviation Week
MEMBER CENTER
LOG IN | REGISTER | SUBSCRIBE
Blogs Forums Photos Videos My Aviationweek

Blog Search

Search all Aviation Week.com blog content

Bookmark and Share
Blog Image
A Defense Technology Blog
Nazis And Hortens And Stealth, Oh My!

This Sunday, June 28, National Geographic TV airs Hitler's Stealth Fighter. Set your TiVos or just kick the rest of the family off the TV, because this one should be good.

Back when stealth was very, very secret, a few people quietly advised me to take a look at the Horten Ho229, one of WW2 Germany's most advanced designs - a jet-powered flying wing made of wood. In a German book, a British documentary producer had found something even more interesting:  the Horten brothers, Walter and Reimar, had planned to use a primitive radar absorbent structure (RAS) in the leading edges. They were to be made from a sandwich of plywood around a carbon-loaded filler. The only question: how well would it actually have worked?

Now, we know:

 

blog post photo
National Geographic

 

That's a full-scale Ho229, RAS and all, built by Northrop Grumman and mounted on the pylon at the company's radar cross section test site at Tejon Ranch in the Mojave Desert. Director Mike Jorgensen enlisted the company's help to build and test the replica - and on Sunday we can find out how well it worked. (There's also a spoiler at Wikipedia.)

This is not Jorgensen's first breakthrough project. In the late 1990s, he persuaded Boeing and Lockheed Martin to give his team access to their competing JSF demonstration teams for his award-winning Battle of the X-Planes. (Disclosure: Graham Warwick and I were both consultants for the project, as well as all-too-present onscreen talent.)

And before anyone gets any ideas, the replica has already been donated to the San Diego Aerospace Museum. The only surviving Ho229, the never-flown V3, is in storage at the National Air & Space Museum.

Tags: ar99hortenstealth
Email this post
User Image
Obamanite wrote:
Man, that is one BEAUTIFUL plane. German WW II engineering is the Alexandria Library of defense technology, no doubt about that. Where would the American strategic missile and space programs be without filched Germans? Gotta give it to the Soviets: they got as far as they did with home-grown talent. We did what we do best, which was provide a permissive context for the inventiveness and creativity of others. One need only compare a Mercedes or a BMW to a Chevy or a Ford to fully appreciate the difference between German engineering and our hick designers. No offense meant, of course...
6/23/2009 9:45 AM CDT
User Image
ghemago wrote:
Thanks a lot for sharing.
Beeing in italy I'll have problems watching but if you see any youtube about it... post the link...

Did you notice that the national markings in the replica are the only wrong detail ... ;-)
6/23/2009 9:58 AM CDT
User Image
Bill Sweetman wrote:
Ghemago - but where would they put the swastikas? They were on the vertical tails (or so I remember from those non-PC kitmakers who did not leave them out) and the Ho229 has none.
6/23/2009 1:03 PM CDT
User Image
robtheorg wrote:
Even with the additional space from the new Dulles Annex - the Smithsonian hasn't put this unique plane on display. They have center section from IIIh on display - but not this one.
6/23/2009 3:15 PM CDT
User Image
DensityDuck wrote:
Obamanite: Whoops, my Tiger just blew its transmission out. Third time this week. Bummer.

Oh, BTW, the Soviets had as many German rocketry and advanced-aerospace workers as we did. You just don't hear about them because, being German, they were inherently guilty of unapproved wrongthink. And, in the Soviet Union, unapproved things unhappen.
6/23/2009 3:25 PM CDT
User Image
Solomon wrote:
So we have the Germans to thank for modern space travel, the worlds first modern main battle tank (Panther not Tiger), first OPERATIONAL jet fighter (easy Sweetman) and now for the first stealth prototype. Amazing. for some evil bast*$%s they sure made some cool stuff...great post.
6/23/2009 4:45 PM CDT
User Image
Obamanite wrote:
DensityDuck: Tiger? Don't know that one. Having owned German automobiles (mostly BMW) and known many others who have, I have no complaints. Having driven many an American rental all I can say is... ugh. As for the Soviet Germans, sure, they had some, but their chief rocket designer was 100% Russian, unlike Herr von Braun...

Solomon: the Nazis were definitely evil. Same cannot be said of all of their engineers and designers, nor even of every man (and woman) in their armed forces.
6/23/2009 5:22 PM CDT
User Image
energo wrote:
Wouldn't the exposed inlet/engine give a considerable RCS in the forward aspect? http://tinyurl.com/km2lt8

B. Bolsøy
Oslo
6/24/2009 4:42 AM CDT
User Image
Airpower wrote:
They are all on the dark side of the moon you know. Preparing.
6/24/2009 6:39 AM CDT
User Image
How would this supposed RAS shield against CH, which operated at high HF and low VHF frequencies? Can we make RAS today that is effective at these frequencies?
6/24/2009 1:58 PM CDT
Most Recent Tags
Defense Industry News
Recent Photos
Industry Insight: Defense & Technology Insight by
Raytheon
Selected Videos