Sign-up to receive weekly MRO email updates with news, commentary, photos, videos and more!
MRO executives throughout the world rely on Aviation Week's MRO Edition comprehensive reporting and analysis of the global aftermarket.
MRO Links is an exciting new program that satisfies buyer needs, while providing marketers with an unduplicated lead generation program.
Based on an index of data representing information about which employees care most.
Aviation Week named the 2012 companies most likely to meet the mark.
Aviation Week is proud to announce its new Innovation Special Topic page.
Check out articles, white papers, interactive features and more related to aviation, aerospace and defense innovation.
View the November 2012 Zinio edition of MRO Links from AviationWeek & Space Technology
Visit our MRO Links Page »
EASA has given Airbus A330 operators five years to replace all four wing tank fuel pressure switches with "new ones with a more robust design preventing water accumulation and freezing." (AD 2010-0018.) At least one operator has reported an in-flight engine spool-down as a result of the problem, EASA noted in both the AD and last October's draft rule.Air France submitted the only comments on the draft AD. The carrier noted that the pressure switches being replaced are installed on the A340 and A320 family as well, while the new switches cannot be installed on A320s. This, notes Air France, leaves open the possibility that the old switches might work their way back into a carrier's A330 spares stock and end up back in the wing tank system. (The same switches are found elsewhere in the A330 fuel system, but only the wing tank switches are affected by the directive.) Air France suggested that the design of the new switch be reviewed and modified so it is physically different from the old switch, to decrease likelihood that the the old switches are put on an A330 wing tank pump.EASA said that human factors were considered, and that installing an old switch in "one, two or three" of the affected locations would not create an unsafe condition on the A330. In addition, a physical change would both eliminate the part's "interchangability" on the rest of the the Airbus long-range fleet, and would require "at least" a fuel tank entry on the A330s, which would introduce additional risk. (NOTE: See .ZIP file contents for Air France's comments and EASA's responses.)
om99, Airbus, A330, AD, EASA
Copyright © 2013, Aviation Week, a division of McGraw Hill Financial.