FAA Rejects AAIB Recommendations On Landing Gear, Interior Lighting Crashworthiness

By Sean Broderick sean.broderick@aviationweek.com
Source: AWIN First
November 27, 2013

The FAA, responding to a formal recommendation, is telling the U.K. Aviation Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) that it has no plans to require that landing gear designs factor in the effects of soft ground on gear breakaway sequences, an AAIB report reveals.

“The FAA reviewed this issue with EASA [the European Aviation Safety Agency] and concluded that a change to the regulatory requirements for landing gear failures to account for the effects of landing on different types of surfaces is not warranted at this time,” the AAIB says in its recently released annual safety report.

“Such a change would require significant industry support and data that is currently unavailable,” the report adds.

The issue came to light following the 2008 non-fatal crash-landing of a British Airways (BA) Boeing 777 just short of its intended runway at London Heathrow Airport. During the accident sequence, the 777’s left main gear attachments sheared away as designed, but the right main gear attachments did not. The resulting damage included a center fuel tank rupture.

The 777’s main landing gear is designed to break away when overloaded via strength-controlled fuse pins. The pins break in a specific sequence, primarily to minimize the risk of fuel tank ruptures.

As part of the AAIB’s investigation, Cranfield Impact Centre (CIC) researchers studied the BA 777 accident sequence. They concluded that the 777 gear breakaway sequence is different depending on the surface where the accident occurs.

“In the soft ground accident simulation, the results showed that only one of the fuse pins failed,” the AAIB says in its final report on the accident. “A delayed build-up of shear forces in the pins [when compared to impact with hard ground] prevented most of them from reaching their failure loads,” it adds,

This can transfer loads to other areas, including the rear spars, causing damage to fuel tanks. This is what investigators believed happened to the BA 777.

CIC notes that its simulation used even softer ground than the soil present at the accident site, likely distorting the results. “However, the analysis did indicate that landing gear interaction with soft ground can substantially modify the breakaway sequence,” the AAIB says.


Comments On Articles